Law & Government Products : When A Driver Refuses To Take Responsibility For A Motor Vehicle Accident That Injured A Pedestrian
|
By: Joseph Hernandez
 
Date Submitted: 2009-09-20 18:23:48 - Article Views: 20125
|
|
It is not unusual for an attorney to review a motor vehicle accident case in which the individual who is injured and wishes to pursue a claim tells one story of how the accident too place and the driver who would be the defendant in the case tells a completely different story - always one in which he or she is not at fault and is not liable for the accident. This happens even when the would-be defendant has insurance that would sufficiently cover the range the settlement or verdict is likely to fall in. So the motive is never really clear. It is up to the attorney who reviews the case on behalf of the injured individual to determine what evidence, if any, exists that they can use to disprove the version of the accident told by the would-be defendant.
Consider the example provided by the following two cases:
Case 1:
The driver in this motor vehicle accident hit a 75 year old man as he was crossing the street. The driver was driving a van at the time of the accident. He claimed that the man came out abruptly from the middle of two cars that were parked at the side of the street and that the man actually ran into the can causing damage to the side. The male pedestrian was crossing the street in order to return to his car which was double parked. He sustained a fracture to his shoulder, a fracture to his collarbone, and a fracture to his ankle. He required screws and a metal plate inserted into his ankle. An active man prior to the accident his life changed greatly after.
The law firm that represented the pedestrian requested that the defense produce evidence of the damage to the side of the van claimed by the driver. The only damage that was documented was a cracked windshield - consistent with the front of the van striking pedestrian and inconsistent with the pedestrian hitting the side of the van. Still, the defendant's insurance company refused to settle the case. The law firm representing the pedestrian reported that it went forward to trial where it achieved a $475,000 verdict for the pedestrian.
Case 2:
The driver in this motor vehicle accident was stopped for a red light before proceeding into the intersection and hitting a pedestrian who was in a crosswalk at the intersection. The driver claimed that the light had turned green before he drove his vehicle into the intersection. He even identified two witnesses who said the driver's light was green at the time of the accident. The pedestrian who was hit ended up with a fracture to the back of the skull. She also had bleeding of the brain. She was 71 years old. She was in the middle of the crosswalk when the vehicle hit her. Her position was that she had a go signal at the time she starting walking across the crosswalk and that it began flashing red after she was already in the crosswalk.
The law firm that represented the pedestrian did not need to rebut the witnesses produced by the driver. All they had to do was to convince the driver's insurance company adjuster that the driver was at fault even if his claim that the light had turned green before he drove into the crosswalk were true they faced a significant risk of an adverse verdict at trial. The driver was in effect claiming that as long as he had a green light he had the right to not pay attention to the road in front of him and had the right to hit a pedestrian in his way rather than waiting for the pedestrian to finish crossing the crosswalk before proceeding. The law firm reported that the insurance company settled for $300,000, the full limit of the van's insurance coverage.
The cases above are just two examples of how hard defendants will try to avoid responsibility for an accident, even when they have sufficient insurance to cover them. Sometimes they simply view the facts from a perspective that clears them of fault. Sometimes they remember the accident different from how it actually happened. Sometimes they just plain lie.
To make matters worse, insurance company adjusters seem all to ready to take their insured's version of the accident at face value and to totally discount the injured victim's version. Statistically, this makes sense especially when there are no witnesses. Deny enough claims and some of them will settle for nuisance value. Of those that do not, if the defense wins half those cases at trial the insurance companies will save millions each year.
Deciding whether to retain an accident reconstruction expert for a case is a matter of judgment. For some cases, it is absolutely necessary such as when the lack of an expert would make it impossible for the jury to understand how the accident occurred. There are factors that can make a difference in the way motor vehicles move that cannot be taken into account merely using the average person's experience and common sense. An accident reconstruction expert is necessary if without the testimony of one the jury would not be able to understand how the accident actually happened and the value of the case merits the expense.
When it is not necessary it may be better to let the jury go through the evidence and see through the story told by the defendant. |
|
|
 Author Resource Required for Reprint:
Joseph Hernandez is an Attorney focused on catastrophic injury cases. To learn more about how a pedestrian accident lawyer can help you visit his website at www.vehicle-accident-law.com.
|
|
Article Source:
Echievements
Back to Top
|
Tags:
pedestrian accident lawyer  |
|
|
Bookmark and Share
|
|
 Law & Government Products Category Rss Feed |
-
Although the general rule is that parents are not held liable for the acts of their children, there are certain situations in which parents will be held responsible for the bad acts of their offspring.
Viewed: 112 Times.
Read More ...
-
Personal injury as a result of auto accidents mostly car accidents leave the victim in a traumatic condition but this financial compensation can relieve the pressure to some extent.
Viewed: 112 Times.
Read More ...
-
A 2003 landmark tax case, Amos v. Commissioner, allows the IRS to tax Personal Injury settlements which include Confidentiality Provisions.
Viewed: 112 Times.
Read More ...
-
The loss of a home is tragic under any conditions. The loss of a home to bankruptcy is a tragedy. Seek help from local Aurora bankruptcy lawyers now to help stave off foreclosure and the possibility of losing your home.
Viewed: 112 Times.
Read More ...
-
The need for student loans has risen dramatically in the last 20 years as the cost of education rose. Along with this increase, the rate of default has increased as well. What will happen to your loans if you file for bankruptcy? Florida bankruptcy lawyers are well versed on this topic and should be consulted to help you weigh out all your options.
Viewed: 112 Times.
Read More ...
|
|
| Joseph Hernandez's Author Feed |
-
Given the risk of serious harm or even death of the mother and her unborn baby from a placental abruption doctors and nurses need to be able to (1) identify when a pregnant woman displays symptoms consistent with a placental abruption and (2) immediately take appropriate action. Failure to do so may result in a medical malpractice claim.
Viewed: 112 Times.
Read More ...
-
It is not uncommon for an attorney representing a bicyclist badly injured by a motor vehicle to that the defense making an offer so low it just does not match the reality of the defendant's liability and the plaintiff's injuries. The attorney will then not hesitate to take the case to trial where a jury will award the plaintiff an amount for which the defendant s not willing to settle the claim.
Viewed: 112 Times.
Read More ...
-
You have been injured in a car accident. An experienced car crash lawyer can make the difference between a full and fair recovery for your injuries and losses and a barely adequate recovery. Your initial meeting with the lawyer is critical as the lawyer will use it to assess you as a potential plaintiff and client and will assess your potential case. Know what to expect and prepare.
Viewed: 113 Times.
Read More ...
-
Motor vehicle accidents involving pedestrians often result in serious injuries leading to permanent disabilities. Pedestrian accidents involving teenagers can harm the victim in ways that will affect them for the rest of what will hopefully be a long life. Experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys can properly valuate the harm and ensure that the maximum amount of compensation is recovered.
Viewed: 113 Times.
Read More ...
-
It is not uncommon for an attorney who handled motor vehicle cases to be presented with one in which the accounts of the accident given by the victim blames another driver while that driver blames the victim. This article analyzes how a law firm handled a motor vehicle accident case in which the driver who caused it gave a false account of the accident.
Viewed: 113 Times.
Read More ...
|
|
Article use is considered your agreement of our Terms of Service.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Thanks for visiting Echievements
Copyright © 2008 - 2011 Echievements
Back to Top
|
Print
